Review procedure / Budownictwo o zoptymalizowanym potencjale energetycznym

REVIEW PROCEDURE

To evaluate each publication two independent Reviewers are appointed from outside the scientific unit affiliated by the Author of the publication.
The Editorial Board select the Reviewers according to the topics presented in the article sent for publication.
Authors and Reviewers do not know each other's identities (double-blind review).
The review contains a clear conclusion of the Reviewer regarding the conditions for admitting the article to publication or its rejection.
The condition for qualifying the article for the further publishing process is obtaining two unambiguously positive reviews.
If the article requires significant changes, the text is sent for re-review to the same Reviewer.
If one positive and one negative review is obtained, an additional Reviewer will be appointed.
Two negative reviews are the reason for rejecting the article.
The Authors are informed about the results of the review they receive for inspection after concealing the name of the Reviewer.
Authors should refer to the comments of the Reviewer and promptly return the corrected text.
The names of the Reviewers of individual publications are not disclosed.
The list of Reviewers of articles is available at least once a year on the journal's website and in the printed number.

Politechnika Częstochowska uczelnią dostępną.
Projekt współfinansowany przez Unię Europejską w ramach Europejskiego Funduszu Społecznego.