GUIDELINES FOR REVIEWERS
- The Reviewers undertake to observe the rules of ethics in their reviews.
- The Reviewers must agree to the processing of their personal data entrusted to the Editorial Office of the Journal.
- The Reviewers must declare that they have read the privacy policy posted on the journal's website.
- If the Reviewer declines the invitation, it would be helpful to the Editorial Board to make suggestions for alternative Reviewers.
- The Editorial Board asks the Reviewers to respond to the invitation as soon as possible, even if it is to be rejected. A delay in decision slows down the review process and means more waiting for the Author for his or her publication to come out.
- The Reviewers should evaluate the presented work in an objective manner and present the formulated comments in a clear manner along with supporting arguments, so that the Authors can use them to improve the submitted material. The review will help the Editor decide whether or not to publish the article, it will also aid the Author and allow them to improve their manuscript.
- Comments for Authors should not include any ad hominem remarks or personal details including Reviewer name. The journal has a double-blind review system, Authors and Reviewers do not know each other's identities.
- The Reviewers except the detailed comments and information for Authors may also provide confidential comments to the Editorial Board.
- The review should be sent online to the Editorial Office via the journal's website from the panel Submit review
- As part of the performed review the Reviewer indicate whether the article meets the criteria required for scientific publications, or fail to meet them, presents relevant comments to the presented text and states if the article can be published without making changes or can be published after making the changes indicated in the review or is not eligible for printing.
Each Reviewer receives a certificate of completion of the review in a given calendar year.
The Editorial Board would like to thank sincerely all Reviewers on behalf of yourself and the Authors for the time you have taken to give your valuable input to the articles, to constantly improve the quality of the published content and the journal.